Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Raymond Sarmiento vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sarmiento vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Raymond Sarmiento vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sarmiento 0 - 0 Chappell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarmiento has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chappell has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarmiento, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 49.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sarmiento has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 54.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sarmiento has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chappell winning 50% (W/L 39/ 39) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sarmiento has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 48/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 150), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarmiento has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 240.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarmiento has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarmiento has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 39.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
882
Rank
287
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
468
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
59% (169-117)
Career Total W/L
53% (303-269)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (12-18)
$30,950
Career Prize Money
$24,525
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Raymond Sarmiento vs Nick Chappell For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sarmiento VS Chappell
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Raymond Sarmiento | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (12/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (29/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (304/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 265.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1238/2012) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (817/1238) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (375/774) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (84/211) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (807/2095) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (2/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (10/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (12/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 12% (17/2) |
Raymond Sarmiento Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Michael Mmoh
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Alexander Brown
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Shunsuke Mitsui
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Yankel Zemel
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Farren
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 3-6 9-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Nick Chappell
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
16 of
28)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
50
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Nick Chappell
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Nick Chappell
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sarmiento Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sarmiento are available here and Chappell photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
